Managing, sharing and re-using qualitative data: Approaches that integrate data protection, research ethics and research interests
or: How researchers and data providers work together to make qualitative research data available for scientific re-use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1158Keywords:
qualitative data, research data management, data sharing, qualitative research, re-use of qualitative data, cooperationAbstract
In numerous research projects, researchers generate a rich variety of qualitative research data. It is generated through the application of different research methods and manifests itself in different data types and formats. In their heterogeneity, these data allow insights into people's everyday lives from different perspectives. Qualitative research data is rich and often offers analytical potential for further research. However, in comparison to quantitative social research, where the secondary use of data is established practice, qualitative data is still used rather hesitantly. This is where the article comes in. Infrastructurally established approaches to data sharing, that take into account data protection and research ethics aspects and enable FAIR data sharing of qualitative data, are presented. It is based on the solutions of various Research Data Centers (RDCs) of a network of qualitative research data infrastructures (QualidataNet), which was established as part of the National Research Data Infrastructure in Germany. The QualidataNet network is open to all RDCs, repositories and other archiving partners that hold qualitative data. It enables as a ‘central point of entry' 1) to provide researchers with easier access to qualitative data, to support the management of qualitative data and to help finding suitable archiving partners and 2) to promote the exchange among data providers and the development of best practices for the management, sharing and reuse of qualitative data. The article addresses how ‘cooperative data management’ makes it possible to integrate and accompany important steps of data preparation for data sharing into the research process, so that synergies also arise for the primary research itself.
References
Akademie für Soziologie, A. (2019). Richtlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten in der Soziologie. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/174572/440f0736e5ee261b9c9e9a5df6f9ff67/richtlinien-forschungsdaten-soziologie-data.pdf
Betancort Cabrera, N., Bongartz, E. C., Dörrenbächer, N., Goebel, J., Kaluza, H., & Siegers, P. (2020). White Paper on implementing the FAIR principles for data in the Social, Behavioural, and Economic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.60
Betancort Cabrera, N., & Haake, E. (2014). Das Qualiservice Metadatenschema. Qualiservice. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00103643-13
Betancort Cabrera, N., & Mozygemba, K. (2024). Improving interdisciplinary research with cross-domain metadata for qualitative data objects. In: Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC) Conference 2024 online.
DDI Alliance. (2025). Sampling Procedure (Version 2.0.0) [Controlled vocabulary]. CESSDA. urn:ddi:int.ddi.cv:SamplingProcedure:2.0.0.
DDI Qualitative Data Subgroup. Retrieved November 2025 from https://ddi-alliance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DDI4/pages/3083862017/Qualitative+Data+Subgroup
DuBois, J. M., Strait, M., & Walsh, H. (2018). Is It Time to Share Qualitative Research Data? Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000076
Eberhard, I. (2020). Der Kontext bestimmt alles. Kontextdaten und Containerobjekte als Lösungsmöglichkeit für den Umgang mit sozialwissenschaftlichen qualitativen Daten. Erfahrungen aus dem Pilotprojekt 'Ethnographische Datenarchivierung' an der Universitätsbibliothek Wien. ABI Technik, 40(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2020-2007
Fielding, N. (2004). Getting the most from archived qualitative data: epistemological, practical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570310001640699
FSSDA. Anonymisation and Personal Data. Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/en/services/data-management-guidelines/anonymisation-and-identifiers/
FSSDA. Documenting background information. Finnish Social Science Data Archive. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/en/services/data-management-guidelines/processing-qualitative-data-files/#background
Gebel, T., Rosenbohm, S., & Hense, A. (2017). Sekundäranalyse qualitativer Interviewdaten. Neue Perspektiven in der Industrial Relations-Forschung. Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, 24(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3224/indbez.v24i1.02
German Anthropological Association. (2019). Position paper on the handling of anthropological research data [Position paper]. https://www.dgska.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Positionspapier_Bearbeitet-fu%CC%88r-MV_EN_29.11.2019.pdf
German Data Forum (RatSWD). Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.konsortswd.de/en/about/ratswd/
German Research Foundation (2015). DFG Guidelines on the Handling of Research Data. German Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2312/ALLIANZOA.019
Habermas, T. (2022). The longitudinal study of brief life narratives: Mainlife Study (2022-2019). Qualiservice & Gesis. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1651
Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking Qualitative Data. Sage.
Heuer, J.-O., Kretzer, S., Mozygemba, K., Huber, E., & Hollstein, B. (2025). Contextualizing qualitative research data for secondary re-use — a guide for researchers on the preparation of a study report. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice Working Paper QS-WP-1-2020, Bremen, Qualiservice. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3791
Hollstein, B., & Ullrich, C. G. (2003). Einheit trotz Vielfalt? Zum konstitutiven Kern qualitativer Sozialforschung. Soziologie, 32(4), 29-43.
Hoyle, L., Corti, L., Gregory, A., Martinez, A., Wackerow, A., Alvar, E., Betancort Cabrera, N., Gallagher, D., Gebel, T., Hautamaki, J., Kuula-Luumi, A., McEachern, S., & Zuell, C. (2013). A Qualitative Data Model for DDI https://doi.org/10.3886/DDIWORKINGPAPER05
Huber, E., Imeri, S. (2021). Informed consent in ethnographic research: A common practice facing new challenges (Vol. 4-2021). Qualiservice. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1070
Imeri, S., Sterzer, W., & Harbeck, M. (2019). Forschungsdatenmanagement in den ethnologischen Fächern. Bericht aus dem Fachinformationsdienst Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie. Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.18452/21500
KonsortSWD - NFDI4Society. Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.konsortswd.de/en/
Mannheimer, S., Pienta, A., Kirilova, D., Elman, C., Wutich, A. (2019). Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges. American Bahavioral Scientist, 63(5), 643-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991
McCarthy, M., Gillies, K., Rousseau, N., Wade, J., Gamble, C., Toomey, E., Matvienko-Sikar, K., Sydes, M., Dowling, M., Bryant, V., Biesty, L., Houghton, C. (2023). Qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: towards the production of good practice guidance. HRB Open Research, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13667.1
Medjedović, I. (2011). Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 12, No 3 (2011): Qualitative Archives and Biographical Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-12.3.1742
Medjedović, I. (2014). Qualitative Sekundäranalyse: zum Potenzial einer neuen Forschungsstrategie in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer VS.
Medjedović, I. (2020). Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Daten: Expertise im Rahmen der BMBF-Förderlinie 'Forschung zu sexualisierter Gewalt in pädagogischen Kontexten'. In M. Wazlawik & B. Christmann (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten (Vol. 6, pp. 9-43). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Medjedović, I., & Witzel, A. (2010). Wiederverwendung qualitativer Daten. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Minion, J. (2023). Managing Qualitative Research Data. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), Research Data Management in the Canadian Context: A Guide for Practitioners and Learners (English ed.). Western University, Western Libraries.
Mozersky, J., Parsons, M., Walsh, H., Baldwin, K., McIntosh, T., & DuBois, J. M. (2020). Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing. Ethics & Human Research, 42(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500044
Mozersky, J., Walsh, H., Parsons, M., McIntosh, T., Baldwin, K., & DuBois, J. M. (2020). Are we ready to share qualitative research data? Knowledge and preparedness among qualitative researchers, IRB Members, and data repositories curators. IASSIST Quarterly, 43(4). https://doi.org/doi:10.29173/iq952
Mozygemba, K., Betancort Cabrera, N. (2025). Specifics of metadata development for qualitative social research. IASSIST 2025, Bristol, UK. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15855651
Mozygemba, K., Hollstein, B. (2025). Guidance on the anonymization and pseudonymization of qualitative text-based research data. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice-Working Paper QS-WP-5-2023, Bremen.
Mozygemba, K., Gebel, T., Hanekop, H., Köchling, S., Lösch, T., Reineke, S., Schierbaum, K. (2025): Forschungsdatenmanagement und Data Sharing qualitativer Daten - Eine Handreichung von QualidataNet. KonsortSWD Working Paper 14/2025. Konsortium für die Sozial-, Verhaltens-, Bildungs- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (KonsortSWD-NFDI4Society). https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/4334
National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI). Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.nfdi.de/?lang=en
Nicolai, T., Mozygemba, K., Kretzer, S., Hollstein, B., & Gordeev, E. (2025). QualiAnon - Qualiservice tool for anonymising text data. Qualiservice. https://github.com/pangaea-data-publisher/qualianon
OECD. (2025). Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding (OECD/LEGAL/0321, Ed.), retrieved November 2025 from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/157/157.en.pdf
Opitz, D., & Mauer, R. (2005). Erfahrungen mit der Sekundärnutzung von qualitativem Datenmaterial – Erste Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung im Rahmen der Machbarkeitsstudie zur Archivierung und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Interviewdaten. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501431
Qualitative Data Repository (QDR). De-identification. Retrieved November 2025 from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/human-participants/deidentification
Qualitative Data Repository (QDR). Preparing a data project: Organization and Documentation. Retrieved November 2025 from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/managing/preparing-data
Pels, P., Boog, I., Florusbosch, J. H., Kripe, Z., Minter, T., Postma, M., Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., Simpson, B., Dilger, H., Schönhuth, M., Poser, A., Castillo, R. C. A., Lederman, R., & Richards-Rissetto, H. (2018). Data management in anthropology. The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 26(3), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526
Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E. Y., Jang, S. G., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics. J Prev Med Public Health, 56, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451
QualidataNet. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.qualidatanet.com/en/
Qualiservice. (2025a). Template for the study information and informed consent in scientific research projects. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3790
Qualiservice. (2025b). Template for the study information and the informed consent form for the transmission, archiving and further scientific use of personal data. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3789
Qualiservice Metadata Schema. Retrieved April 2025 from https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/Qualiservice_Data_Model
Research Data Center Archive for Spoken German. Retrieved April 2025 from https://agd.ids-mannheim.de/index_en.shtml
Research Data Center eLabour. Retrieved April 2025 from http://elabour.de/
Research Data Center for Business and Organizational Data (RDC-BO). Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.diw.de/en/diw_01.c.670982.en/pages/research_data_center_for_business_and_organizational_data__rdc-bo.html
Research Data Center for Education. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.fdz-bildung.de/home?la=en
Research Data Center for Higher Education. Retrieved April 2025 from https://fdz.dzhw.eu/en
Research Data Center Qualiservice. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.qualiservice.org/en/
Rizzoli, M., Imeri, S., & Huber, E. (2025). Preparing and documenting ethnographic data for archiving and subsequent use — an overview for researchers. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice Working Paper QS-WP-6-2024, Bremen. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3800
Schönbrodt, F., Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm;, & Board, o. b. o. t. D. E. (2016). Data Management in Pychological Science: Specification of the DFG Guidelines. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/172820/ac1f45756a20cdb2b69ba443d6f73e58/empfehlungen-forschungsdaten-psychologie-en-data.pdf
Sherif, V. (2018). Evaluating Preexisting Qualitative Research Data for Secondary Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.2.2821
UKDS. Anonymising qualitative data. Retrieved April 2025 from https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/learning-hub/research-data-management/anonymisation/anonymising-qualitative-data/
UKDS. Best practice for documenting data collections. UK data service. Retrieved April 2025 from https://trainingmodules.ukdataservice.ac.uk/documenting_collections/#/
UNESCO (2003). Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/charter-preservation-digital-heritage
von der Dunk, A., & Gille, T. (2020). Ohne Fundament geht nichts. Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Praxis. Forschung & Lehre, 27(11), 922-923.
von Unger, H. (2018). Ethische Reflexivität in der Fluchtforschung. Erfahrungen aus einem soziologischen Lehrforschungsprojekt. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3151
von Unger, H. (2020). Management, Archivierung und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten zu sexueller Gewalt. Eine Einschätzung aus forschungsethischer Perspektive. In M. Wazlawik & B. Christmann (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten. Perspektiven für die Forschung zu sexualisierter Gewalt (pp. 45-74). Springer.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., & et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kati Mozygemba

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
The Creative Commons-Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 International applies to all works published by IASSIST Quarterly. Authors will retain copyright of the work. Your contribution will be available at the IASSIST Quarterly website when announced on the IASSIST list server.


