Managing, sharing and re-using qualitative data: Approaches that integrate data protection, research ethics and research interests

or: How researchers and data providers work together to make qualitative research data available for scientific re-use

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1158

Keywords:

qualitative data, research data management, data sharing, qualitative research, re-use of qualitative data, cooperation

Abstract

In numerous research projects, researchers generate a rich variety of qualitative research data. It is generated through the application of different research methods and manifests itself in different data types and formats. In their heterogeneity, these data allow insights into people's everyday lives from different perspectives. Qualitative research data is rich and often offers analytical potential for further research. However, in comparison to quantitative social research, where the secondary use of data is established practice, qualitative data is still used rather hesitantly. This is where the article comes in. Infrastructurally established approaches to data sharing, that take into account data protection and research ethics aspects and enable FAIR data sharing of qualitative data, are presented. It is based on the solutions of various Research Data Centers (RDCs) of a network of qualitative research data infrastructures (QualidataNet), which was established as part of the National Research Data Infrastructure in Germany. The QualidataNet network is open to all RDCs, repositories and other archiving partners that hold qualitative data. It enables as a ‘central point of entry' 1) to provide researchers with easier access to qualitative data, to support the management of qualitative data and to help finding suitable archiving partners and 2) to promote the exchange among data providers and the development of best practices for the management, sharing and reuse of qualitative data. The article addresses how ‘cooperative data management’ makes it possible to integrate and accompany important steps of data preparation for data sharing into the research process, so that synergies also arise for the primary research itself.

References

Akademie für Soziologie, A. (2019). Richtlinien zum Umgang mit Forschungsdaten in der Soziologie. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/174572/440f0736e5ee261b9c9e9a5df6f9ff67/richtlinien-forschungsdaten-soziologie-data.pdf

Betancort Cabrera, N., Bongartz, E. C., Dörrenbächer, N., Goebel, J., Kaluza, H., & Siegers, P. (2020). White Paper on implementing the FAIR principles for data in the Social, Behavioural, and Economic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.60

Betancort Cabrera, N., & Haake, E. (2014). Das Qualiservice Metadatenschema. Qualiservice. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00103643-13

Betancort Cabrera, N., & Mozygemba, K. (2024). Improving interdisciplinary research with cross-domain metadata for qualitative data objects. In: Helmholtz Metadata Collaboration (HMC) Conference 2024 online.

DDI Alliance. (2025). Sampling Procedure (Version 2.0.0) [Controlled vocabulary]. CESSDA. urn:ddi:int.ddi.cv:SamplingProcedure:2.0.0.

DDI Qualitative Data Subgroup. Retrieved November 2025 from https://ddi-alliance.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DDI4/pages/3083862017/Qualitative+Data+Subgroup

DuBois, J. M., Strait, M., & Walsh, H. (2018). Is It Time to Share Qualitative Research Data? Qualitative Psychology, 5(3), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000076

Eberhard, I. (2020). Der Kontext bestimmt alles. Kontextdaten und Containerobjekte als Lösungsmöglichkeit für den Umgang mit sozialwissenschaftlichen qualitativen Daten. Erfahrungen aus dem Pilotprojekt 'Ethnographische Datenarchivierung' an der Universitätsbibliothek Wien. ABI Technik, 40(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1515/abitech-2020-2007

Fielding, N. (2004). Getting the most from archived qualitative data: epistemological, practical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570310001640699

FSSDA. Anonymisation and Personal Data. Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/en/services/data-management-guidelines/anonymisation-and-identifiers/

FSSDA. Documenting background information. Finnish Social Science Data Archive. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/en/services/data-management-guidelines/processing-qualitative-data-files/#background

Gebel, T., Rosenbohm, S., & Hense, A. (2017). Sekundäranalyse qualitativer Interviewdaten. Neue Perspektiven in der Industrial Relations-Forschung. Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, 24(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.3224/indbez.v24i1.02

German Anthropological Association. (2019). Position paper on the handling of anthropological research data [Position paper]. https://www.dgska.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Positionspapier_Bearbeitet-fu%CC%88r-MV_EN_29.11.2019.pdf

German Data Forum (RatSWD). Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.konsortswd.de/en/about/ratswd/

German Research Foundation (2015). DFG Guidelines on the Handling of Research Data. German Research Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2312/ALLIANZOA.019

Habermas, T. (2022). The longitudinal study of brief life narratives: Mainlife Study (2022-2019). Qualiservice & Gesis. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1651

Heaton, J. (2004). Reworking Qualitative Data. Sage.

Heuer, J.-O., Kretzer, S., Mozygemba, K., Huber, E., & Hollstein, B. (2025). Contextualizing qualitative research data for secondary re-use — a guide for researchers on the preparation of a study report. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice Working Paper QS-WP-1-2020, Bremen, Qualiservice. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3791

Hollstein, B., & Ullrich, C. G. (2003). Einheit trotz Vielfalt? Zum konstitutiven Kern qualitativer Sozialforschung. Soziologie, 32(4), 29-43.

Hoyle, L., Corti, L., Gregory, A., Martinez, A., Wackerow, A., Alvar, E., Betancort Cabrera, N., Gallagher, D., Gebel, T., Hautamaki, J., Kuula-Luumi, A., McEachern, S., & Zuell, C. (2013). A Qualitative Data Model for DDI https://doi.org/10.3886/DDIWORKINGPAPER05

Huber, E., Imeri, S. (2021). Informed consent in ethnographic research: A common practice facing new challenges (Vol. 4-2021). Qualiservice. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/1070

Imeri, S., Sterzer, W., & Harbeck, M. (2019). Forschungsdatenmanagement in den ethnologischen Fächern. Bericht aus dem Fachinformationsdienst Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie. Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.18452/21500

KonsortSWD - NFDI4Society. Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.konsortswd.de/en/

Mannheimer, S., Pienta, A., Kirilova, D., Elman, C., Wutich, A. (2019). Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges. American Bahavioral Scientist, 63(5), 643-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991

McCarthy, M., Gillies, K., Rousseau, N., Wade, J., Gamble, C., Toomey, E., Matvienko-Sikar, K., Sydes, M., Dowling, M., Bryant, V., Biesty, L., Houghton, C. (2023). Qualitative data sharing practices in clinical trials in the UK and Ireland: towards the production of good practice guidance. HRB Open Research, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13667.1

Medjedović, I. (2011). Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Interview Data: Objections and Experiences. Results of a German Feasibility Study. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 12, No 3 (2011): Qualitative Archives and Biographical Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-12.3.1742

Medjedović, I. (2014). Qualitative Sekundäranalyse: zum Potenzial einer neuen Forschungsstrategie in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer VS.

Medjedović, I. (2020). Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Daten: Expertise im Rahmen der BMBF-Förderlinie 'Forschung zu sexualisierter Gewalt in pädagogischen Kontexten'. In M. Wazlawik & B. Christmann (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten (Vol. 6, pp. 9-43). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Medjedović, I., & Witzel, A. (2010). Wiederverwendung qualitativer Daten. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Minion, J. (2023). Managing Qualitative Research Data. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), Research Data Management in the Canadian Context: A Guide for Practitioners and Learners (English ed.). Western University, Western Libraries.

Mozersky, J., Parsons, M., Walsh, H., Baldwin, K., McIntosh, T., & DuBois, J. M. (2020). Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing. Ethics & Human Research, 42(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500044

Mozersky, J., Walsh, H., Parsons, M., McIntosh, T., Baldwin, K., & DuBois, J. M. (2020). Are we ready to share qualitative research data? Knowledge and preparedness among qualitative researchers, IRB Members, and data repositories curators. IASSIST Quarterly, 43(4). https://doi.org/doi:10.29173/iq952

Mozygemba, K., Betancort Cabrera, N. (2025). Specifics of metadata development for qualitative social research. IASSIST 2025, Bristol, UK. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15855651

Mozygemba, K., Hollstein, B. (2025). Guidance on the anonymization and pseudonymization of qualitative text-based research data. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice-Working Paper QS-WP-5-2023, Bremen.

Mozygemba, K., Gebel, T., Hanekop, H., Köchling, S., Lösch, T., Reineke, S., Schierbaum, K. (2025): Forschungsdatenmanagement und Data Sharing qualitativer Daten - Eine Handreichung von QualidataNet. KonsortSWD Working Paper 14/2025. Konsortium für die Sozial-, Verhaltens-, Bildungs- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (KonsortSWD-NFDI4Society). https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/4334

National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI). Retrieved November 2025 from https://www.nfdi.de/?lang=en

Nicolai, T., Mozygemba, K., Kretzer, S., Hollstein, B., & Gordeev, E. (2025). QualiAnon - Qualiservice tool for anonymising text data. Qualiservice. https://github.com/pangaea-data-publisher/qualianon

OECD. (2025). Declaration on Access to Research Data from Public Funding (OECD/LEGAL/0321, Ed.), retrieved November 2025 from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/157/157.en.pdf

Opitz, D., & Mauer, R. (2005). Erfahrungen mit der Sekundärnutzung von qualitativem Datenmaterial – Erste Ergebnisse einer schriftlichen Befragung im Rahmen der Machbarkeitsstudie zur Archivierung und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Interviewdaten. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501431

Qualitative Data Repository (QDR). De-identification. Retrieved November 2025 from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/human-participants/deidentification

Qualitative Data Repository (QDR). Preparing a data project: Organization and Documentation. Retrieved November 2025 from https://qdr.syr.edu/guidance/managing/preparing-data

Pels, P., Boog, I., Florusbosch, J. H., Kripe, Z., Minter, T., Postma, M., Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., Simpson, B., Dilger, H., Schönhuth, M., Poser, A., Castillo, R. C. A., Lederman, R., & Richards-Rissetto, H. (2018). Data management in anthropology. The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 26(3), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526

Pyo, J., Lee, W., Choi, E. Y., Jang, S. G., & Ock, M. (2023). Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Necessity and Characteristics. J Prev Med Public Health, 56, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.451

QualidataNet. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.qualidatanet.com/en/

Qualiservice. (2025a). Template for the study information and informed consent in scientific research projects. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3790

Qualiservice. (2025b). Template for the study information and the informed consent form for the transmission, archiving and further scientific use of personal data. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3789

Qualiservice Metadata Schema. Retrieved April 2025 from https://wiki.pangaea.de/wiki/Qualiservice_Data_Model

Research Data Center Archive for Spoken German. Retrieved April 2025 from https://agd.ids-mannheim.de/index_en.shtml

Research Data Center eLabour. Retrieved April 2025 from http://elabour.de/

Research Data Center for Business and Organizational Data (RDC-BO). Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.diw.de/en/diw_01.c.670982.en/pages/research_data_center_for_business_and_organizational_data__rdc-bo.html

Research Data Center for Education. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.fdz-bildung.de/home?la=en

Research Data Center for Higher Education. Retrieved April 2025 from https://fdz.dzhw.eu/en

Research Data Center Qualiservice. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.qualiservice.org/en/

Rizzoli, M., Imeri, S., & Huber, E. (2025). Preparing and documenting ethnographic data for archiving and subsequent use — an overview for researchers. Translated and adapted version of the Qualiservice Working Paper QS-WP-6-2024, Bremen. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3800

Schönbrodt, F., Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm;, & Board, o. b. o. t. D. E. (2016). Data Management in Pychological Science: Specification of the DFG Guidelines. https://www.dfg.de/resource/blob/172820/ac1f45756a20cdb2b69ba443d6f73e58/empfehlungen-forschungsdaten-psychologie-en-data.pdf

Sherif, V. (2018). Evaluating Preexisting Qualitative Research Data for Secondary Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.2.2821

UKDS. Anonymising qualitative data. Retrieved April 2025 from https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/learning-hub/research-data-management/anonymisation/anonymising-qualitative-data/

UKDS. Best practice for documenting data collections. UK data service. Retrieved April 2025 from https://trainingmodules.ukdataservice.ac.uk/documenting_collections/#/

UNESCO (2003). Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage. Retrieved April 2025 from https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/charter-preservation-digital-heritage

von der Dunk, A., & Gille, T. (2020). Ohne Fundament geht nichts. Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Praxis. Forschung & Lehre, 27(11), 922-923.

von Unger, H. (2018). Ethische Reflexivität in der Fluchtforschung. Erfahrungen aus einem soziologischen Lehrforschungsprojekt. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3151

von Unger, H. (2020). Management, Archivierung und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten zu sexueller Gewalt. Eine Einschätzung aus forschungsethischer Perspektive. In M. Wazlawik & B. Christmann (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement und Sekundärnutzung qualitativer Forschungsdaten. Perspektiven für die Forschung zu sexualisierter Gewalt (pp. 45-74). Springer.

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., & et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Mozygemba, K. (2026). Managing, sharing and re-using qualitative data: Approaches that integrate data protection, research ethics and research interests: or: How researchers and data providers work together to make qualitative research data available for scientific re-use. IASSIST Quarterly, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1158